Part 35 · Special Collector Categories

Media, Journalism, RTI & The Collector's Rights Charter — RTI, Defamation, Whistleblowing, Blacklists, Public Apology, Policy Advocacy, India's First Numismatic Rights Charter

RTI for collectors, defamation risks, whistleblowing, blacklists, public apology, policy advocacy, and India's First Numismatic Rights Charter.

9 questions in this part

1 Can a journalist legally investigate and expose a fraudulent numismatic dealer? 2 Can a numismatic content creator be held liable for reviewing a dealer negatively? 3 Is there whistleblower protection for someone who exposes large-scale numismatic fraud? 4 Can you legally create and publish a blacklist of fraudulent numismatic dealers? 5 What is the legal difference between a review, an allegation, and a warning in the numismatic context? 6 Can RBI be compelled through court or RTI to create a public registry of authorised numismatic dealers? 7 Is naming a fraudulent dealer in a YouTube video legally safer than naming them in a written article? 8 Can you use the Consumer Protection Act to force a dealer to publicly apologise? 9 Can a numismatic community petition the RBI or Finance Ministry for policy changes?